For instance, the gruesome nature of the novel’s ending when Babe leads Szell to Central Park before firing his gun at him got replaced by a less violent scene (256). However, Schlesinger’s film highlights the suspense of the action-thriller plot based on an emotional approach that hides some of the character’s flaws. William Goldman’s 1974 novel draws a bare look at the gruesome nature of the Nazi regime embedded in the conspiracy plot that finds its way to American soil bringing an ethical argument of the character’s values. While the Marathon Runner film comes with a strong aspect of conspiracy in its text, the movie turns to a suspense-thriller genre that, in turn, downplays some of the book’s emphasis. Goldman’s novel used ethical approaches involving explicit and gruesome details, while Schlesinger’s film used pathos rhetoric to address the book’s issues less intensely while attaining Hollywood success. These variations include the genre, script, and, eventually, the overall theoretical strategy used. Even so, there are some differences between the novel and its film adaption. Furthermore, the plot involves Doc’s brother, Thomas “Babe,” and his lover searching for the diamonds that eventually end up with Babe. Henry, known as “Doc,” is an American agency agent in a relationship with Peter Janeway, who leads the agency’s investigation. The film, adapted to screen by director John Schlesinger focused on a Nazi war criminal, Christian Szell, who searches for diamonds he acquired illegally during the Second World War. The Marathon Runner novel by William Goldman, published in 1974, preceded a Hollywood adaption of the same name that shared most of the book’s script.

Marathon Runner Book vs Novel: An Analysis

Marathon man novel